<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Highlander Principle &#187; Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/category/management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com</link>
	<description>One IT Architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 DirectAccess internal network may become inaccessible</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2010/01/windows-7-directaccess-internal-network-may-become-inaccessible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2010/01/windows-7-directaccess-internal-network-may-become-inaccessible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes we can be guilty of making assumptions. We can enable a remote access technology without much concern for impacting operations on the internal network right? Wrong!</p>
<p>Because DirectAccess modifies the behaviour of the Windows7 machine you need to make absolutely certain all the ducks are in a line or you risk internally connected users being denied [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2010/01/windows-7-directaccess-internal-network-may-become-inaccessible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 upgrade and replacement from XP and Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/12/windows-7-upgrade-and-replacement-from-xp-and-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/12/windows-7-upgrade-and-replacement-from-xp-and-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like 2010 could be the year most organisations kick start a desktop refresh. I suspect many held off on upgrading to Vista so for many it’s a Windows XP to Windows 7 upgrade path. I wanted to revisit some of the old challenges in these projects and look at some of the new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/12/windows-7-upgrade-and-replacement-from-xp-and-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DirectAccess in Windows 2008 R2 with Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/11/directaccess-in-windows-2008-r2-with-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/11/directaccess-in-windows-2008-r2-with-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I remember a few years ago Microsoft created linkage between product releases (to generate cumulative sales?). I believe the trio were Exchange, Vista and Office. While the cumulative features had merit I don’t think there was a strong enough business driver.</p>
<p>So now we have a similar linkage between Windows 2008 and Windows 7. This time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/11/directaccess-in-windows-2008-r2-with-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DataCenter Buzzword Bingo</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/11/datacenter-buzzword-bingo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/11/datacenter-buzzword-bingo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently finished an exercise defining the technical standards for one of Europe&#8217;s largest managed service providers. As part of the exercise I gathered the key capabilities across the various infrastructure silos across the Data-centre.</p>
<p>I found that it was a trawl to separate the facts from the fiction in the vendor marketing. I have gathered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/11/datacenter-buzzword-bingo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to establish a TOGAF9 Enterprise Architecture Practice &#8211; Phase A</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-a/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>TOGAF has a method called the ADM (Architectural Development Method), the good news is that the same method applies to defining any Architecture (including setting up the Architecture Practice itself).</p>
<p>The ADM breaks down into phases that are run iteratively (not always in a set sequence). So lets get started with Phase A:</p>
<p>Phase A &#8211; Setting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to establish a TOGAF9 Enterprise Architecture Practice &#8211; Phase B</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>TOGAF breaks down Architecture into the following pillars:</p>

Business Architecture
Application and Data Architecture
Technology Architecture

<p>Phase B on our quest to establish an EA practice focuses on Business Architecture:</p>

Terminology: Define a set of standards so that everyone is talking consistent language (formal term here is Ontology)
Process: The ADM (architectural development method) is open to be tuned to suit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to establish a TOGAF9 Enterprise Architecture Practice &#8211; Phase C</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>TOGAF uses a term “Enterprise Continuum” and I wish they would think of a different phrase as it throws me each time. It’s important we know exactly what it is as it’s the key deliverable for Phase C.</p>
<p>It relates to three elements:</p>

Architecture Continuum
Solutions Continuum
Architecture Repository

<p>Consider the repository as a folder full of documents, the usual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to establish an TOGAF9 Enterprise Architecture Practice &#8211; Phase D to H</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-d-to-h/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-d-to-h/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that most of the legwork to get the ball rolling is done in phases A to C. Here is what is left:</p>
<p>Phase D: Define the technology that is used within the EA practice, ideally a TOGAF aware repository. If nothing else set standards for people to follow; for example always create [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice-phase-d-to-h/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to establish a TOGAF 9 Enterprise Architecture Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All the rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s start by establishing what does an EA practice do for your organisation. The EA practice should identify</p>

Where are you?
Where do you want to be?
How do you get there?

<p>The reason the methodology is so important is that all three of these answers are always changing. The wind of change blows in for a huge array [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/how-to-establish-a-togaf9-ea-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware vSphere v Microsoft HyperV</title>
		<link>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/vmware-vsphere-v-microsoft-hyperv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/vmware-vsphere-v-microsoft-hyperv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Preston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe the first rule of drawing comparisons is to compare apples with apples. As I mentioned in an earlier blog Vsphere is a group of products, Hyper-V is a capability of one product – namely Windows 2008.</p>
<p>So let’s start with VMware ESX v Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V</p>
<p>I see a lot of HyperVisor experts jumping [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.highlanderprinciple.com/2009/10/vmware-vsphere-v-microsoft-hyperv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

